![]() (1) This rule applies where the claimant is making a claim for money. (Part 22 requires a claim form to be verified by a statement of truth)īack to top Statement of value to be included in the claim form (5) The court may grant any remedy to which the claimant is entitled, even if that remedy is not specified in the claim form. (4) If the defendant is sued in a representative capacity, the claim form must state what that capacity is. (3) If the claimant is claiming in a representative capacity, the claim form must state what that capacity is. (2) If the particulars of claim specified in rule 16.4 are not contained in, or are not served with the claim form, the claimant must state on the claim form that the particulars of claim will follow. (b) brief details of the circumstances in which it is alleged that the liability of the Crown arose. (a) the names of the government departments and officers of the Crown concerned and (1A) In civil proceedings against the Crown, as defined in rule 66.1(2), the claim form must also contain – (e) contain such other matters as may be set out in a practice direction. (d) contain a statement of the interest accrued on that sum, where the only claim is for a specified sum and (c) contain a statement of value in accordance with rule 16.3, where the claimant is making a claim for money (b) specify the remedy which the claimant seeks (a) contain a concise statement of the nature of the claim Statement of value to be included in the claim formĬourt’s power to dispense with statements of caseġ6.1 This Part does not apply where the claimant uses the procedure set out in Part 8 (alternative procedure for claims). Used in this sense, particular can mean any concrete (individual) entity, irrespective of whether it is spatial and temporal or not.Part not to apply where claimant uses Part 8 procedure The term particular is also used as a modern equivalent of the Aristotelian notion of individual substance. In formulating a solution to the problem of universals, the term 'particular' can be used to describe the particular instance of redness of a certain apple as opposed to the 'universal' 'redness' (being abstract). This can occur if there is lack of agreement about the best definition of the term. Some terms are used by philosophers with a rough-and-ready idea of their meaning. Particulars include only individuals of a certain kind: as a first approximation individuals with a definite place in space and time, such as persons and material objects or events, or which must be identified through such individuals, like smiles or thoughts. Universals in each moment of time from point of view of an observer is the collection of particulars that participates it (even a void collection). In nominalist view everything is particular. Redness, by contrast, is not a particular, because it is abstract and multiply instantiated (for example a bicycle, an apple, and a given woman's hair can all be red). For example, Socrates is a particular (there's only one Socrates-the-teacher-of-Plato and one cannot make copies of him, e.g., by cloning him, without introducing new, distinct particulars). There are, however, theories of abstract particulars or tropes. Particulars are often seen as concrete, spatiotemporal entities as opposed to abstract entities, such as properties or numbers. Universals concern features that can be exemplified by various different particulars. ![]() In metaphysics, particulars or individuals are usually contrasted with universals.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |